<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Statute Law Review - current issue</title>
<link>http://slr.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Statute Law Review - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1464-3863</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>November 2007</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Statute Law Review</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0144-3593</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/182?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/218?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Principle of 'interpretation conforme': How Far Can or Should National Courts Go when Interpreting National Legislation Consistently with European Community Law?]]></title>
<link>http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sawyer, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/slr/hmm006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Principle of 'interpretation conforme': How Far Can or Should National Courts Go when Interpreting National Legislation Consistently with European Community Law?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>181</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/182?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Scots Statute Style and Substance]]></title>
<link>http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/182?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>New or renewed legislatures afford opportunities for reassessing old legislatures, and introducing new and improved forms of legislative composition. Thus the North American experience, derived from the breakaway Colonies, came down heavily against referential legislation, the Australian and New Zealand experience implemented many Benthamite reforms ahead of the Old Country, and the <I>tabula rasa</I> afforded generally by Colonial and Commonwealth legislation at first enabled, and eventually enforced on its parent legislature, an explicit and consistently adhered to system of textual amendment. In view of the opportunities afforded by Scottish Devolution, what innovations may we expect of the new Scottish statute? Thanks to the earlier work of Coode,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn1">1</cross-ref> to the continuing surveillance of the Statute Law Society,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn2">2</cross-ref> to the committed enthusiasm of parliamentary counsel such as Driedger,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn3">3</cross-ref> Dale,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn4">4</cross-ref> and Bennion,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn5">5</cross-ref> and especially to the seminal work of linguistic analysts such as Plowden,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn6">6</cross-ref> Mellinkoff,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn7">7</cross-ref> Frye,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn8">8</cross-ref> and Bowers,<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn9">9</cross-ref> new theories, practices, forms, and precedents abound as never before for statute law. Nevertheless, there are also questions of tradition, culture, and national identity at issue&mdash;especially for a restored or reborn legislature such as the present Scottish Parliament.<cross-ref type="fn" refid="fn10">10</cross-ref> This paper examines some of the issues, both in terms of legislative style and legislative substance, which pertain to the new Scottish statute.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamieson, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/slr/hmm007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Scots Statute Style and Substance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>182</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Tight Fit ? Deficiencies in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations 2001]]></title>
<link>http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/slr/hmm008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Tight Fit ? Deficiencies in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations 2001]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>217</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/218?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Over-Regulation and Suing the State for Negligent Legislation]]></title>
<link>http://slr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/28/3/218?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake, L., Pointing, J., Sinnamon, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/slr/hmm009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Over-Regulation and Suing the State for Negligent Legislation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>28</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>234</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>